LOL! BOTR's panties are really in wad because I, a mere 2nd-year law student DARED disagree with her! ROTGLMAO!!
I have no idea what law school you are attending. My law school continues to be in the top tier.
I attend the University of Washington School of Law, a top 20 school (tier 1).
We were taught legal concepts and social justice, besides black letter law. It was illegal to help slaves escape. Do you recall the Fugitive Slave Act? It was illegal for women to use birth control? See Griswold v. Connecticut and Roe v. Wade.
As are we. In fact, the school has an incestuous relationship with the Gates Foundation. Every week we have a "Social Justice Tuesday" luncheon at which we have speakers/programs on social justice.
I'm also 52 years old, so I have pretty balanced idea of what life is like. In addition, I am originally from California, half my family is Mexican, as is my oldest daughter, so I have an excellent understanding of the challenges facing this young man.
And none of that changes my opinion that he should NOT be allowed bar membership. It's lawyers such as you, who can't put their emotions aside long enough to reason clearly, that are giving the whole industry a bad name.
You know, or SHOULD know, but perhaps you haven't reasoned that far...hint...hint...that THIS case has NOTHING to do with immigration! It will not change the law...as did Griswold...because it is limited to the narrow issue of will he or will he not be admitted to the bar. IT can do NOTHING to change his immigration status! It will do NOTHING to change anyone else's immigration status. If a person or group desires to change immigration law, that person or group needs to bring forth an IMMIGRATION test case.
You're just pissed off because I disagreed with you. You are incapable of crafting a legal argument to defend your position, so you are reduced to making catty comments concerning my school rankings and the source of the documents I posted (legal research/databases).
I notice only one link. Something tells me more than one brief was filed.
Well aren't you just a flippin' legal scientist. Of course, there was more than one brief filed. In fact, think about it BOTR, there are TWO sides to EVERY CASE (appellant/appellee), therefore, there are ALWAYS at least TWO briefs filed!!! ; )
P.S. I hope you were posting legal research for the lay members here. My law library has WestLaw, Lexis, FastTrack, and the standard compliment of books, periodicals, etc.
Tisk...tisk..even my UNDERGRAD institution carried those databases, so I'm really impressed your LAW school had those! But, yes BOTR, it is the courteous thing when posting to provide, if possible, links that people can actually access.
Don't f*ck with me BOTR. I give you a LOT of slack because you are an experienced attorney who, if what you say is correct, did a lot of really good social work. But if you continue to come at me, I will come back at you. And your writing and legal analyses skills are not what they once were, or what you intimate they were. With ten years as a paralegal under my belt before entering law school, you wouldn't be the first arrogant, asshole attorney I put in his or her place.
Note that this is not about the Dream Act, amnesty, border policy, or any of that. It is not about race or ethnicity.
This case is simple: A person who is an illegal immigrant wants to be admitted to the Florida bar. This person DID NOT EVEN TRY to obtain legal status in the U.S. - and yet he wants to become an officer of our court system.
This is ridiculous.
Ditto.